Schools should be allowed to limit students online speech to a certain extent because it violates our first amendment right, committing all actions at home, and because it does not disrupt the learning
You make some good points throughout your writing. However it would be nice to add in a counter example, showing a different point of view. Adding more examples of how limiting online speech can be viewed negatively would be more affective in creating a strong argument. Below I’ve listed some sources that might be helpful to add information onto your paper.
I am happy with your post, “Cruelty to animals,” because of how realistic it is. Animals are people, and they have feelings they just are not able to communicate with us. One sentence you wrote that stands out to me is: ” Dogs are used to walk disabled people like blind people and even used to protect your children from bad people, So…[Read more]
This is a youth-powered social network that was started in 2003 by a group of teachers from local sites of the National Writing Project.
We merged several earlier blogging projects. We have found that there are many advantages to bringing students together in one site that lives beyond any particular class. It's easier for individual students to read and write about their own passions, to connect with other students, comment on each other's work, and create multimedia posts for each other. Further, it's been exciting for us to pool our knowledge about curriculum, connected learning, and digital literacies.
If being part of such a community makes sense to you, we invite you to join us. We welcome all youth and any teacher interested in having students publish online and participate in the give and take of a social network like Youth Voices.