-
Connor commented on the post, Entitlement of Children in America
The issue of mass infantilization I find, is more systemic and that the explanation of “mediocre parenting” does not do enough justice. We can see this all around us in our society. The government compels youth to attend schools where noncompliance and individuality in all its forms is constrained and stifled. Heck, the schools even legally take…Read More
-
Connor commented on the post, Human-Based Determinism
The easy resolution is the realization that predictions are not incompatible with free will. Such a claim is ridiculous. If I can predict the way a congressman will vote based on his party affiliation, is he suddenly some nonhuman agent with no will of his own?
The natural conclusion of deterministic arguments always comes down to self-defeating,…Read More
-
Connor commented on the post, Stepping Up Out of the Armchair
Lily,
Thank you for participating in this discussion. I believe in the importance of diverse discussion, and contrary points of view, such as yours, can only mean well. However, I do not believe that your argument is fair to me or the facts that I present. You described the claims that I presented as “nonetheless . . . not true.”To prove to you…Read More
-
Connor commented on the post, Stepping Up Out of the Armchair
Here’s the citation I’m using for that “nonexistent article” you’re mentioning.
Reynolds, Alan. “Inequality and Taxes.” Cato Policy Report Vol. XXX, No. 5. Sept./Oct. 2008: pp. 1+. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 30 Nov. 2016. http://sks.sirs.com/webapp/article?artno=0000284719&type=ART.
I agree, posting misleading and downright false information…Read More
-
Connor wrote a new post
I have been looking into income inequality as of late. I actually posted about it earlier, and you can find it here. And the information I’ve found now has definitely surprised me. For example, one news article I
7 Comments-
Hi, I would really like to read the “one article” that you cited! Hmm, you said you found a lot of research about income inequality that doesn’t exist. However, you only cited 1 article (the other doesn’t have a source). However, I found a trove of articles+ graphs that show that income inequality exists. The New York Times has a nice collection too (http://www.nytimes.com/topic/subject/income-inequality). To find others, just type in income inequality in to google. Its great to get out of our armchairs (we don’t step out of them usually) but we should’ve been out of our comfy armchairs doing things (like raising minimum wage) a long time ago to protect our incomes.
-
Here’s the citation I’m using for that “nonexistent article” you’re mentioning.
Reynolds, Alan. “Inequality and Taxes.” Cato Policy Report Vol. XXX, No. 5. Sept./Oct. 2008: pp. 1+. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 30 Nov. 2016. http://sks.sirs.com/webapp/article?artno=0000284719&type=ART.
I agree, posting misleading and downright false information can be very destructive to a conversation. However, I would advise you to google that quotation I used, and “Inequality and Taxes” would have been the first thing to pop up. Accusing other people of fabricating their evidence does nothing to add to a discussion, and in my opinion is very reckless of you.
And if you believe in minimum wage, I advise you learn more about it. Because right now it seems that you’re trapped in an armchair.
-
-
I agree about it being great that you expanded your own opinion! However, there are a few things you have said that lead me to question the validity of some of your claims. You said that depressions and recessions are the “greatest factor in reducing inequality”. I’m going to assume you’re talking about income inequality, but nonetheless that is not true. Recessions and depressions are detrimental to the employment rate, inflation rate, and the overall economy, or business cycle. Recessions often occur due to high inflation, which leaves the value of your dollar worth much less. This doesn’t affect the rich nearly as much as the poor. When this inflation begins to recede, unemployment strikes, which often times is worse for the poor than for the rich.
I like that you expanded, but I think it’s important to look at multiple professional sources before taking them to be accurate and true.-
Lily,
Thank you for participating in this discussion. I believe in the importance of diverse discussion, and contrary points of view, such as yours, can only mean well. However, I do not believe that your argument is fair to me or the facts that I present. You described the claims that I presented as “nonetheless . . . not true.”To prove to you that my reasoning (and it’s not even mine, this is something I learned from an article that, surprise surprise, I wasn’t expecting to learn–the focus of this post) is solidly based, let’s have an example:
Suppose there are two people who have cones with scoops of ice cream in them. The first person has a cone with 1 scoop of ice cream in it and the second person has a cone with 10 scoops. Now suppose again that a strong gust of wind comes around and blows half of each person’s ice cream to the ground. Now, one person has 1/2 of a scoop, the other 5 scoops. Where’s before there was a difference of 9 scoops between them, there is now only 4 and 1/2. Inequality has factually been decreased, regardless of how much ice cream either of them have.
You can’t just say the wind affected the 1-scoop person more than the 10-scoop person, when the second person has literally lost ten times the amount of ice cream. This isn’t a claim about how much ice cream either of them should be satisfied with, merely that the difference between the two counts has been decreased.
Please do not condemn my claims simply for their stance. Please do not assume my claims are something that they are not. I understand that you have many long-standing prejudices concerning inequality,
“but I think it’s important to look at multiple professional sources before taking them to be accurate and true.”
And Just as well, I think it’s important to look past your prejudices and not simply project them.
Thanks.
-
-
I think you make a great point, people need to actually try and educate themselves more. People get stuck in echo-chambers and never feel the need to go out and challenge their beliefs. Whether you agree with a point or not, I believe we should all absorb media that may not be our norm.
Great Points -
I believe this is a very important topic. We learned about this a bit in my highschool’s economic class, and over the summer we were told to read the book “Aftershock” by Robert Reich. I’d highly recommend on reading that, it having some good info on this in some chapters. I also agree with listening to more non traditional viewpoints. I’d rather learn those then listen to what Trump is currently doing unrelated to politics. Your facts are well written, and you’ve done some good research.
- Load More Posts
Media
Photos
Videos
Audios
Files
Sorry, no items found.
Friends

Niko
@okinniko
Recent Posts

Stepping Up Out of the Armchair
- December 3, 2016

Inquiry: Income Inequality
- November 19, 2016

Draining the Swamp
- November 10, 2016

Voter Fraud and other Crises
- October 18, 2016

Malaise as if it were a Localised Miasma
- October 4, 2016
This has got to be my favorite post I have ever read on this website. Props to you for not doing what everyone else does and finding information to justify your position, but instead becoming informed on the realities of the phenomenon. I am very interested in this topic and find your insight about governmental policies very interesting. I look forward to looking into this issue more myself, as I plan to become a public policy maker, but the information you have provided is very helpful and enlightening. I would also try to look into time in US history or in other places when income inequality was drastically lower, and see if it would be possible for us to imitate systems like these now.