Throughout our education we take standardized tests from the ACT to SAT, but do they really define a student? Some of the cons of standardized testing is it only considers a single test score when it comes to evaluation. The students growth is not in evaluation and the personal experiences the child goes through leading up to the testing date is not considered. Results don’t consider a child’s background and home life when it comes to learning the material needed for these standardized tests. Additionally, standardized testing does not test every field of education causing the results to not be as accurate when it comes to scoring a child’s intelligence.
Tags: education Judge Memorial Catholic High School standardized testing
According to data from 19 nationally representative studies by Stanford University sociologist Sean Reardon, found that the gap between children of families in the lowest and highest parts of socioeconomic status is more than one standard higher on reading tests at kindergarten entry, which is an amount equal to roughly 3 to 6 years of learning in middle school. This study also showed the relationship between a family’s income position and their child’s academic performance has grown substantially stronger during the last half century. This evidence indicates that with a child’s home life not taken into account when it comes to standardized testing they are bound to fail because of there inconsistency in learning.